In 2009 two neighbourhoods separated by one street had not spoken in eleven years. There was no war. There was no treaty to sign. There was just a slow, ordinary hardening — the kind that does not make the news and does not go away on its own.
We booked a hall on neutral ground, put out thirty chairs, and invited both sides to a conversation with a single rule: you may say anything, but before you answer, you must be able to repeat what the last person said in a way they would accept.
Four people came. The following week, nine. By the eleventh Tuesday there were not enough chairs, and by the spring the two neighbourhoods held a shared vigil that has now run for sixteen consecutive years.
Nothing about that is dramatic. That is precisely the finding. The method is repeatable, it is cheap, it survives handover to local leadership, and it works in places where far better-funded processes have collapsed. Seventeen years later it runs in forty-two countries — and none of it depends on us.